Talk:Audio editing software

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Audio editing software article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional sound production Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 15 May 2023 for a period of one week.

"Unix-like"

What is the problem with "Unix-like"? Darrien 15:43, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

It's developed for Linux, not for any other platform. That it happens to run on FreeBSD is nice, but that doesn't make it a FreeBSD app any more than being able to run MS Office under WINE makes Office a Linux app.

Why are you so eager to cleanse mention of Linux even when the app is specifically developed for Linux as per the project web page (e.g. Rosegarden, Asterisk)? I understand and agree with removing gratuitous Linuxisms, but when it's the actual targeted platform, cleansing all mention is just POV-pushing anti-advocacy - David Gerard 15:49, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Is Wavosaur free?

In wavosaur webpage (http://www.wavosaur.com/) stated that "Wavosaur is a free sound editor..." . But in this article table it attributed to not free software. Is it because of different definition of free software? Zomby5178 (talk) 17:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. There is no mention to free software licenses or copyright permissions on that web page. Unfortunately, "freedom" is an ambiguous word; but in the software world the term free software is usually meant to evoke freedom, not price. In practice free software is almost equivalent to open-source software; and if you're wondering whether there is a word for zero-price software you should look for freeware, (which sounds different, but is still misleading, because it's just a portmanteau of "free" and "software", and it looses the soft- particle).

Many other movements have found inspiration in free software philosophy, extending the libertarian sense of "free" to advocate against copyright restrictions, as Wikipedia does. See free content and Free_culture_movement. To avoid confusion, some people interchange "free" with "libre", a word found in many Latin-based languages that translates as "free as in liberty", but not as "free as in free sandwiches"

In a nutshell, it's very likely Wavosaur is freeware, and isn't free software --Isacdaavid (talk) 17:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Audio editing software → Audio editor – The title is more concise. 192.107.120.90 (talk) 15:07, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Amakuru (talk) 16:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the target currently redirects to Audio engineer, and seems possible that an "editor" may be a person rather than a software. Needs discussion. — Amakuru (talk) 16:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wiki Education assignment: Editing and Multimedia Production

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 7 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oreok03, Luzcommunication, Adoobs, DehydratedBarb, Lastolympian01 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Riddle2525, Diligent Daisy, Lemonlimecelcius, Btsailfish, Wxgirl24.

— Assignment last updated by Riddle2525 (talk) 01:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is missing lots of history and can be improved in citations within the limitations section as there are little. --Adoobs (talk) 19:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]